Is There a
Vitamin D Deficiency Epidemic in Australia , and if So, Is This a
Major Contributing Factor to Disease and is
vitamin D3 the new super nutrient? A summary of evidence.
Russell Setright
Abstract
A review of published
studies found that a significant number of Australians and New Zealanders have
less than optimal serum vitamin D levels, with mild to moderate deficiency
ranging from 33 to 84% depending on age, skin colour and/or those in
residential care.
These studies have
also reported a significant relationship between low vitamin D status and an
increase in the prevalence of diseases including; diabetes, CVD, metabolic
syndrome, osteoporosis, hypertension, certain cancers, several autoimmune
diseases the Flu and all cause mortality. The data also suggest that normalising
blood 25(OH)VitD levels by supplementation with vitamin D3 may
have a positive effect in disease prevention.
Background
Ecological studies have suggested that mortality
from several potentially life-threatening chronic diseases increase in incidence with a
decreased exposure to sun light (Grant WB.
Ecologic studies of solar UV-B radiation and cancer mortality rates. Recent
Results Cancer Res. 2003;164:371-377)
Because sun exposure is necessary for the synthesis of vitamin D in the skin,
this review will show that the associations found between sun exposure, vitamin
D intake and mortality(death) from several chronic conditions could be owing to
variations in vitamin D status.
There
are two forms of vitamin D that are important in humans: ergocalciferol
(vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin
D3). Vitamin D2 is synthesized by plants and
obtained by humans through diet. Vitamin D3 is made in the skin when 7-dehydrocholesterol reacts with ultraviolet-B (UVB) rays from
sunlight at wavelengths between 270–300 nm and stored in the blood
as calcidiol (25-hydroxy-vitamin D). Both
D2 and D3 precursors are hydroxylated in the kidneys and liver to form 25-
hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)vit.D), the non-active 'storage' form, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D. 1,25 (OH)2D, the biologically active (hormone) form that is tightly
controlled by the body.
One
of the functions of vitamin D is to maintain normal blood levels of calcium and
phosphorus which helps form and maintain strong bones.
However,
research also suggests that increased blood levels of 25(OH)VitD may provide
protection from CVD, diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, certain cancers, and
several autoimmune diseases.
The
sun is a significant contributor to our daily production of vitamin D3. However,
the amount of sun exposure required to produce enough vitamin D3 is dependent on a number of
factors including, skin colour, latitude, types of clothing, body mass, age,
cloud cover, atmospheric pollution.
In
Australia
we are exposed to around 40% more UV rays than the equivalent latitude in the
Northern Hemisphere and this creates a dilemma
(Madronich S,
et al. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the
earth's surface. Photochem Photobiol B 1998;46:5-19).
Is
this increased UV exposure in the Southern Hemisphere and the resulting skin
sun damage more detrimental to overall health than vitamin D deficiency?
There is evidence
that excessive sun exposure increases the risk of skin damage, ageing and skin
cancers. Excessive
exposure to sunlight causing sunburn at any time in life increases a person's
risk of developing skin cancer. However, people who experience intermittent
exposure to high levels of UV radiation such as tanning on the beach on the weekend,
appear to be at greater risk while those who experience continual exposure to
lower levels even if the total dose of UV radiation is the same, have the
lowest incidence of melanoma. That is, non-burning regular sun exposure such as
obtained in the early morning and later in the afternoon seems to have a
protective effect against skin cancer (Article, Prevention
& Early Detection, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre 2008). And, a moderate
amount of unblocked sunlight may actually be beneficial to most people, and could
reduce the risk of many other diseases – including, paradoxically, melanoma
itself.
Another
example of this paradox is research from the University Of California
School Of Medicine . This study found that higher
incidence of melanoma occurred among Navy desk workers than among sailors who
worked outdoors (Garland FC.
et al. Occupational sunlight exposure and melanoma in the U.S. Navy. Arch Environ Health. 1990
Sep-Oct;45(5):261-7).
Also,
a study (Nürnberg
B, et al. 2008)
from the Department of Dermatology, The Saarland University Hospital, Homburg , Germany
that examined the progression of malignant melanoma reported. Basal
25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were lower in melanoma patients as compared to the
control group. And progression of malignant melanoma was associated with significantly reduced 25(OH)vit D serum
levels. Their findings add to the growing body of evidence that 25(OH)vit D
serum levels may be of importance for pathogenesis and progression of malignant
melanoma (Nürnberg
B, et al. Progression of malignant melanoma is associated with reduced
25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels.Exp Dermatol.
2008 Jul;17(7):627).
As, the growing
body of evidence supports the theory that
low blood serum levels of 25(OH)vit D is also associated with an
increase of many diseases including CVD, diabetes, certain cancers,
osteoporosis, muscular and bone strength and death from all causes
(Dobnig H, et al.
Independent association of low serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D with all cause
mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008 Jun 23;168:1340-1349).
A strategy of timed low dose
sun exposure needs to be developed to maintain adequate vitamin D levels.
However, given the vast difference in geographical location, skin type and
ethnic origin we have in Australia
a “One Fits All” program would be improbable.
As the data are
supportive of maintaining adequate serum vitamin D levels, while at the same
time reducing the risk of overexposure of UV rays from the sun.
Supplementation with
vitamin D3 may be the best
way of achieving both goals.
Vitamin D deficiencies in Australia
The
data are consistent in that low blood serum levels of 25(OH)VitD (25-hydroxyvitamin
D) is at an alarming rate in Australia .
Those people with dark or olive skin, the elderly and veiled (80% may have mild
deficiency) as well as those who wear protective clothing and always use sun
screen have the greatest risk of vitamin D deficiency (FIG 1). In addition, those taking anticonvulsant medication or
suffer from renal, hepatic or cardiopulmonary disease or those who have fat malabsorption syndromes (e.g., cystic fibrosis) or
inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's disease, are at risk. (Vitamin D,
National Health and Medical Research Council 2010, Ministry of Health.
Australian Government).FIG. 1
2: Proportion of women
with serum vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D3) levels under
22.5nmol/L, according to skin covering and skin colour
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Skin colour
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Skin covering*
|
Very dark
|
Intermediate
|
Light
|
Total
|
|
||||
Consistently covered
|
6/6 (100%)
|
1/2 (50%)
|
23/25 (92%)
|
30/33 (91%)
|
Inconsistently covered
|
3/5 (60%)
|
1/3 (33%)
|
18/24 (75%)
|
22/32 (69%)
|
Uncovered
|
2/2 (100%)
|
2/3 (67%)
|
0 (0)
|
4/5 (80%)
|
Total
|
11/13 (85%)
|
4/8 (50%)
|
41/49 (84%)
|
56/70 (80%)
|
|
||||
*Consistently covered -
women always covered up, including arms, hair and neck, when outdoors;
inconsistently covered - women did not usually cover fully in their own
garden; and uncovered - women did not generally cover their arms, hair and
neck when outdoors.
|
Nozza J et al. MJA 2001; 175: 253-255
What are Serum 25(OH)VitD Norms?
It
has already been established that low serum levels of vitamin D that is below
27.5nmol/Lt results in inadequate
mineralisation
/ demineralisation of the skeleton that is a contributing factor to rickets in
young children. (Vitamin D, National Health and Medical
Research Council 2010, Ministry of Health. Australian Government) . In a position statement, a Working Group from the
Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society, the Endocrine Society of
Australia and Osteoporosis Australia (2005) defined mild deficiency for adults
as serum 25-OHvitD levels between 25 and 50nmol/L which may contribute to an
increased risk of osteoporosis and less commonly osteomalacia in adults (NHMRC).
The
question often asked is, what blood serum 25(OH)VitD level is considered to be
adequate?
Any
level below 50nmol/Lt may also place an individual at high risk of vitamin D
associated deficiency diseases and all cause mortality. Levels of vitamin D
between 73 – 100 nmol/Lt would appear to be adequate.
One
Prospective cohort study of 3258 consecutive male and female patients found
that those with low levels of serum vitamin D had a 54% to 2.34 times increased
risk mortality from any cause when compared to people with adequate levels of around 72nmol/Lt. (Fig. 2)
Also,
this study found that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels that are in the lower 50% of
the vitamin D range of the study population have an increased risk for
all-cause mortality after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk
factors. In subgroup analysis, the relationship of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D
levels to mortality is consistent regardless of co-morbidity, physical activity
level.
The
researchers concluded that a low 25-hydroxyvitamin D level can be considered a
strong risk indicator for death from any cause in men and women (Dobnig H, et al. Independent association of low serum
25-Hydroxyvitamin D with all cause mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine.
2008 Jun 23;168:1340-1349).
25(OH)VitD blood levels
(Dobnig H et
al 2008)
Fig.
2
25(OH)VitD
Status
|
nmol/Lt
|
Deficient
Highest Risk
|
‹ 37.4
|
Deficient
High Risk
|
37.4 - 50
|
Insufficient
Moderate Risk
|
50-72
|
Adequate
Low Risk
|
›73
|
Excellent stuff russell. Look forward to more blog posts.
ReplyDelete